Tuesday, 24 Safar 1431 AH  

Recommend this Site
to your friends
JOIN MAILING LIST
 
   
 
   
Featured

Free mixing Between the Sexes

How to Perform the Rituals of Hajj and Umrah

Hajj: A Symbol of Tawheed

The superiority and virtues of the first 10 days of the month of Dhul-Hijjah and the deeds legislated in those days

Lessons from the Farewell Pilgrimage

The Hajj - A Poem

 
 
IN Exclusive :
CD Quality Audio Recitation of the Qur'an
 
Most Visited Articles this Week:

* Forty Hadeeth On: The Islamic Personality
* The Etiquettes Of Marriage And Wedding
* Some Commonly Quoted Fabricated Ahaadeeth
* The Meaning of The Pronoun "We" As Used in The Qur'aan
* The Rights and Duties of Women in Islam

Most Visited Audio Clips this Week:

* Sanakhoodhu ma'aarikanaa ma'ahum...
* Jesus - The Hidden Facts
* Ghurabaa
* Ramadān - Questions and Answers
* Trials and Tribulations: When is the Help of Allah Coming?

 Knowledge > Qur'ān > Tafsīr

'Ulūm al-Qur'ān #7-Tafsir by the Statement of The Companions

by Shaykh Abū Ammār Yasir al-Qadhī
After the Qur'ān and Sunnah, the next important source for understanding the Qur'ān is the understanding of the Companions. The statements of the Companions are taken as a fundamental source of tafsīr for the following reasons:


    1) The primary reason is that the Companions are a generation that was chosen by Allāh to accompany the Prophet (saws), and to pass on the religion and teachings of Islām to later generations. Their character and religious knowledge has been testified by Allāh and the Prophet (saws), for Allāh says in the Qur'ān,

    Muhammad (saws) is the Messenger of Allāh. And those who are with him (i.e., the Companions) are severe against the disbelievers and merciful amongst themselves. You see them bowing and falling down in prostration, seeking the Bounty of Allāh and His Pleasure... [48:29]

    In more than one verse of the Qur'ān, Allāh mentions the fact that

    He is well pleased with them, and they with Him [99:8]

    Thus clearly showing the superiority of the Companions over other generations. The Prophet (saws) said,

    "The best of all mankind are my Companions, then those that will follow them, then those that will follow them."[1]

    2) The Companions actually witnessed the revelation of the Qur'ān. Many of its verses were revealed to cater to problems that had risen amongst them. As such, they were familiar with the asbāb an-nuzūl,with the makī and madanī verses, and with the nāsikh and mansūkh,and did not need to go searching for this knowledge, as later generations would have to do.

    3) The Qur'ān was revealed in the Arabic that the Companions spoke. Therefore, many words and phrases that later generations had difficulty understanding were clear to the Companions.

    4) The Companions were the most knowledgeable of generations with regards to pre-Islāmic customs. Therefore, they understood the references in the Qur'ān to such customs.


There is a difference of opinion whether the interpretation of a Companion is of definitive authority. In other words, once a Companion has given an interpretation of a verse, must that interpretation be accepted, as is the case with the previous two sources of tafsīr?

Al-Hākim an-Naisapūrī (d. 404 A.H.), the author of al-Mustadrak, considered any interpretation by a Companion to be equivalent to a hadīth of the Prophet (saws), for he believed that all such interpretations must have originated from the Prophet (saws). However, this opinion is not accepted in its generality, and the majority of scholars, such as an-Nawawī (d. 676 A.H.), As-Suyūtī (d. 911 A.H.), and Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728 A.H.), held the view that the interpretation of a Companion is equivalent to a hadīth of the Prophet (saws) only when it concerns matters which are not based on personal reasoning ( ijtihād), such as reports concerning sabab an-nuzūl, or the knowledge of the unseen.

This is because such knowledge could not have originated from the Companions' ijtihād, and must have come from the Prophet (saws). A report from a Companion not concerning these topics cannot be taken as equivalent to a hadīth of the Prophet (saws); rather, it is given a status below that of a. hadīth.[2] However, this does not diminish the status of the tafsīr from the Companions. The Companions were the most knowledgeable of this nation, and as such their personal reasoning ( ijtihād) occupies a status above that of any later scholar.

Az-Zarkashī summarised this point when he said,

As for the interpretation of the Companions, it is investigated into: if this interpretation was based upon language, then they are the scholars of the language, and there is no doubt that they should be given credence to in this interpretation. If this interpretation relies upon what they saw of asbāb an-nuzūl, or other circumstances (i.e., of pre-Islāmic customs), then again there is no doubt concerning this type of interpretation.[3]

After the interpretation of the Qur'ān by itself and by the hadīth of the Prophet (saws), the Companions relied upon four primary sources to interpret the Qur'ān:[4]



    1) Their knowledge of Arabic language, rhetoric, grammar and pre-Islāmic poetry.

    2) Their knowledge of the pre-Islāmic customs of the Arabs.

    3) Their knowledge of the habits of the Jews and Christians at the time of the revelation of the Qur'ān.

    4) Their personal reasoning and their keen intellect (which, of course, was based upon knowledge).

Another integral aspect of the tafsīr of the Companions is the shādh and mudraj qira’āt which were discussed earlier. It is necessary to take these qira’āt into account when interpreting a verse. As mentioned earlier, such qira’āt cannot be considered as the Qur'ān, but may be studied as tafsīr.

One of the interpretations of this type of qira'āt is that they were added, not as Qur'ān, but for the sake of interpretation by the Companions. For example, in the shādh qirā’a of Ibn Mas'ūd, the verse which told the believers to "fast three days" (5:89) as an expiation of an unfulfilled oath was read by him as: "fast three consecutive days." Due to this shādh qirā’a, later scholars differed over whether it was necessary to fast three consecutive days, or whether it sufficed to fast any three days if one did not fulfil an oath.

To conclude, if the Companions agreed to an interpretation of a verse, that interpretation must be accepted, since it qualifies as ijmā’. On the other hand, if there exist narrations from one Companion concerning the interpretation of a verse, and there does not exist any narrations to the contrary from other Companions, this interpretation is also accepted, but is not equivalent in strength to the interpretation given by the Prophet (saws). If there exist various narrations from different Companions which are not contradictory in nature, then all such interpretations are accepted. If there exist contrary narrations from different Companions concerning the same verse, in this case the researcher can choose between the different interpretations, depending on which interpretation seems to have the strongest evidence to support it.

Tafsīr by the Statement of the Successors

Before moving on to the next section, a brief note concerning the tafsīr narrations from the Successors would be useful. Some scholars took the tafsīr of the Successors to be the next source of tafsīr after the tafsīr of the Companions. As proof for this stance, they relied on the statements of certain prominent Successors concerning their knowledge of the Qur'ān. Qatādah (d. 110 A.H.) said,

"There is not a single verse in the Qur'ān except that I have heard something concerning it."

Mujāhid (d. 103 A.H.) said,

"I recited the Qur'ān to Ibn 'Abbās three times. In each recitation, I stopped at every verse, asking him concerning its interpretation."

This is why Sufyān ath-Thawree (d. 161 A.H.) said,

"When you hear an interpretation from Mujāhid, this should be sufficient for you!"[5]

Other scholars, however, rejected this view. They claimed that an interpretation of a Successor could not have originated from the Prophet (saws), as could the interpretation of a Companion, since they never saw the Prophet (saws). Also, they did not witness the revelation, as did the generation before them, and their trustworthiness is not guaranteed specifically for every one of their generation, unlike the Companions (in other words, the trustworthiness of every single Companions is guaranteed by the Qur'ān, whereas this is not the case for the Successors, for they have been praised as a. generation, and not individually).

Therefore, the correct view in this matter, as Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728 A.H.) said, is that if the Successors give the same interpretation to a verse, then their interpretation must be accepted, but if they differed among themselves, then the opinion of one group will have no authority over the other group, nor over the generations after them. In such cases, one must resort to the Qur'ān, the Sunnah, the Companions, and the Arabic language in order to obtain the correct interpretation.[6]



Footnotes


1 Reported by al-Bukhārī

2 c£ as-Suyūtī, Tadrīb ar-Rāwī, pps. 156-8.

3 az-Zarkashī, v. 2, p. 172.

4 c£ adh-Dhahabī, v. 1, p. 63.

Back
KEYWORD SEARCH






   
Abu Rajaa al `Ataridi, "Nothing that I leave behind grieves me, except that I used to bow down on my face five times a day before my Lord, the Exalted and Most Honored."
[Hilyat al Awliya 2/306]

 
DISCLAIMER: All material found on Islamic Network Websites is for information purposes only. The views expressed on Islaam.Net or on linked sites are not necessarily shared by Islamic Network.